CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. ("Ubiquiti") filed the Complaint in this action on May 18, 2012;
WHEREAS, Ubiquiti filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on October 5, 2012, asserting claims for counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1114; trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114; false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. §1125(a); violation of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; violation of California's Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act; direct copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101; contributory copyright infringement; vicarious copyright infringement; violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200; violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17500; common law infringement and unfair competition; libel; and violation of the Tariff Act under 19 U.S.C. § 1526;
WHEREAS, defendants filed an Answer and Counterclaims on October 29, 2012;
WHEREAS, the Court granted Ubiquiti's motion to dismiss all of defendants' counterclaims except for defendant Kozumi USA Corp.'s claim for breach of contract;
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation, Ubiquiti filed a Second Amended Complaint in this action adding Daniel Hsu as a defendant, and asserting the same claims that were asserted in the FAC;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to settle this action;
WHEREAS, pursuant to that settlement, Kozumi has agreed to dismiss its breach of contract counterclaim with prejudice;
WHEREAS, pursuant to that settlement, Ubiquiti has agreed to dismiss with prejudice all of its claims except for its trademark and copyright infringement claims;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT:
1. Kozumi USA Corp.'s breach of contract counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Ubiquiti's claims for violation of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act; violation of California's Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act; violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17500; common law infringement and unfair competition; libel; and violation of the Tariff Act under 19 U.S.C. § 1526 are dismissed with prejudice.
3. All parties will bear their own attorney's fees and costs.
Respectfully submitted this 27th day of September, 2013.
Pursuant to the stipulation, it is