Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TOPPAN PHOTOMASKS, INC. v. PARK, 3:13-cv-03323-MMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131017a56 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2013
Summary: JOINT REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER MAXINE M. HESNEY, District Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks Inc. ("TPI") and Defendant Keun Taek Park ("Park") (collectively "the Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree to submit to a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge. [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and ADR Local Rule 7-3, the Parties are hereby ordered to submit to a settlement conference before a Magi
More

JOINT REQUEST FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER

MAXINE M. HESNEY, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff Toppan Photomasks Inc. ("TPI") and Defendant Keun Taek Park ("Park") (collectively "the Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree to submit to a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and ADR Local Rule 7-3, the Parties are hereby ordered to submit to a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge to be identified by the Court. at the October 18, 2013, Case Management Conference.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer