Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MOUNT HAMILTON PARTNERS, LLC v. GOOGLE, INC., 3:12-CV-1698-SI (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131018c06 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC ("MHP" or "Plaintiff") and Defendants 1 Groupon, Inc. ("Groupon") and Google, Inc. ("Google") (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby jointly move the Court for an order continuing the scheduled date for a Further Case Management Conference, for the foll
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC ("MHP" or "Plaintiff") and Defendants1 Groupon, Inc. ("Groupon") and Google, Inc. ("Google") (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby jointly move the Court for an order continuing the scheduled date for a Further Case Management Conference, for the following reasons:

1. Pursuant to this Court's October 4, 2013 Order Continuing Further Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 93), the parties are scheduled to participate in a Further Case Management Conference on November 22, 2013.

2. Due to scheduling conflicts, counsel for Groupon is unavailable the week of November 22, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff and Google join in the request for continuing the date for the Further Case Management Conference to the next available date on the Court's calendar.

3. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and request the Court to continue the Further Case Management Conference from November 22 to December 6, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. or such other date and time that is agreeable with the Court's calendar. The requested continuance does not affect any other deadline ordered by the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The two above captioned cases (Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC v. Google Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-1698-SI ("Google case"); Mount Hamilton Partners, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., Case No. 3:12-cv-1700-SI ("Groupon case")) were consolidated for claim construction purposes only.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer