Filed: Oct. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") filed an opening claim construction brief regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 on September 23, 2013 USA Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), submitted two separate responsive briefs on October 15, each absent an express order from the Court. Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, wit
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") filed an opening claim construction brief regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 on September 23, 2013 USA Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), submitted two separate responsive briefs on October 15, each absent an express order from the Court. Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, with..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") filed an opening claim construction brief regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 on September 23, 2013 USA Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), submitted two separate responsive briefs on October 15, each absent an express order from the Court.
Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, with the Court's permission, that Plaintiffs file a single combined reply brief not to exceed 25 pages, instead of two separate reply of up to 15 pages each. Plaintiffs believe that this will minimize repetition and result in fewer pages for the Court to review.
By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendants concur in the filing of this Stipulation.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
