Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WORLEY v. AVANQUEST NORTH AMERICA INC., 3:12-CV-04391-WHO. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131106a52 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION; AND ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs Benson Worley and Johnny Boyd (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Avanquest North America Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' outstanding written discovery r
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION; AND ORDER

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs Benson Worley and Johnny Boyd (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Avanquest North America Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' outstanding written discovery requests, specifically Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents, and document production from November 11, 2013 through and including November 22, 2013. In support of the instant stipulation, the Parties state as follows:

WHEREAS, on October 10, 2013, the Parties conducted a discovery meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f);

WHEREAS, on October 22, 2013, the Parties conducted a follow-up meet and confer to address several outstanding issues;

WHEREAS, by Order entered October 1, 2013, the Court set November 11, 2013 as the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' outstanding written discovery requests (Doc. No. 110);

WHEREAS, due to the additional twelve (12) days needed to complete their Rule 26(f) conference, the Parties have conferred and agreed, subject to the Court's approval, that Defendant may have through and including November 22, 2013 to respond to Plaintiffs' outstanding written discovery;

WHEREAS, Local Rule 6-1(b) allows the parties to stipulate, subject to court-approval, "for any enlargement . . . of time that alters an event or deadline already fixed by Court order;"

WHEREAS, the relief requested herein will not otherwise alter the general case and discovery deadlines in this matter; and

WHEREAS, good cause exists to grant the relief requested herein.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

1. Defendant's responses to Plaintiffs' outstanding written discovery requests and document production shall be due on November 22, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, N. Kathleen Strickland, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing Stipulated Request for Order Continuing Deadline for Defendant's Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and [Proposed] Order. I hereby attest that the above-referenced signatory to this Stipulated Request has concurred in this filing.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer