THOUGHT, INC. v. ORACLE CORPORATION, C12-5601 WHO. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131113867
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. In view of the Court's order requiring Thought to reduce the number of asserted claims and Oracle to reduce its asserted prior art references ( Dkt. 50), the undersigned parties agree that it would be appropriate to extend the deadlines for claim construction disclosures and related deadlines provided by this Court's scheduling order ( Dkt. 40) and the Northern District of California
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. In view of the Court's order requiring Thought to reduce the number of asserted claims and Oracle to reduce its asserted prior art references ( Dkt. 50), the undersigned parties agree that it would be appropriate to extend the deadlines for claim construction disclosures and related deadlines provided by this Court's scheduling order ( Dkt. 40) and the Northern District of California ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCLOSURES
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
In view of the Court's order requiring Thought to reduce the number of asserted claims and Oracle to reduce its asserted prior art references (Dkt. 50), the undersigned parties agree that it would be appropriate to extend the deadlines for claim construction disclosures and related deadlines provided by this Court's scheduling order (Dkt. 40) and the Northern District of California Patent Local Rules to take into account claim and prior art reductions. Accordingly, the undersigned parties jointly request that the Court adopt the following disclosure deadlines:
1. November 12, 2013: Exchange of proposed terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-1(a).
2. November 15, 2013: Parties must meet and confer for the purpose of limiting the number of terms for construction. Patent L.R. 4-1(b).
3. November 22, 2013: Parties exchange proposed constructions, intrinsic evidence, and extrinsic evidence. Patent L.R. 4-2(a)-(b).
4. December 4, 2013: Parties meet and confer for the purposes of narrowing issues, identifying the ten most important terms, and preparing the joint claim construction statement. Patent L.R. 4-2(c).
5. December 11, 2013: Joint claim construction statement. Patent L.R. 4-3.
6. December 20, 2013: Close of claim construction discovery.
7. January 16, 2014: Plaintiff's opening claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 4-5(a).
8. February 13, 2014: Defendant's opening claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 4-5(b).
9. February 28, 2013: Plaintiff's reply claim construction brief. Patent L.R. 4-5(c).
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
