Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 2143 (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131118579 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO DELL INC. AND DELL PRODUCTS L.P.'S COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on September 12, 2013, this Court entered three orders regarding the service of process related to Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.'s ("Dell") Complaint, and also set deadlines for Defendants to file their responses to Dell's Complaint ( see Dkt. Nos. 993, 994, and 995). WHEREAS, the deadlines set forth in the above-referenced Orders
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO DELL INC. AND DELL PRODUCTS L.P.'S COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2013, this Court entered three orders regarding the service of process related to Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P.'s ("Dell") Complaint, and also set deadlines for Defendants to file their responses to Dell's Complaint (see Dkt. Nos. 993, 994, and 995).

WHEREAS, the deadlines set forth in the above-referenced Orders provide for two different response dates for the various Defendants—November 22, 2013 for certain Defendants, and December 6, 2013 or 90 days from receipt by a certain Defendant (or certain Defendants) of the Dell Complaint delivered in the manner stipulated, whichever is later, for other Defendants;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that a single date for all Defendants to respond to Dell's Complaint is preferable, and have agreed that Defendants should have until December 9, 2013 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Dell's Complaint; and

WHEREAS, to the extent any Defendant or Defendants move to dismiss Dell's Complaint, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or otherwise, the parties will work in good faith to agree upon and present to the Court a proposed briefing schedule to resolve those motions, but in no event shall Dell's response to any such motions be due before January 17, 2014;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, and subject to Court approval, that all Defendants shall have until Monday, December 9, 2013 to file their responses to Dell's Complaint. To the extent any Defendant or Defendants move to dismiss that Complaint, the parties shall work in good faith to reach an agreed upon briefing schedule which they will present to the Court no later than December 13, 2013, but in no event shall Dell's response to any such motions be due before January 17, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer