Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SMARTDATA, S.A. v. ROKU, INC., CV 13-01838 SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131125692 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION DISMISSING PLAINTIFF SMARTDATA, S.A.'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN ILSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff SmartData, S.A. ("SmartData") filed a Complaint against Defendant Roku, Inc. ("Roku"), for patent infringement on April 23, 2013 (Dkt. #1). WHEREAS, SmartData amended its complaint on July 18, 2013 (Dkt. #19). WHEREAS, the parties have resolved their dispute with respect to all claims by SmartData against Roku. IT IS HEREBY STIPU
More

STIPULATION DISMISSING PLAINTIFF SMARTDATA, S.A.'S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

SUSAN ILSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff SmartData, S.A. ("SmartData") filed a Complaint against Defendant Roku, Inc. ("Roku"), for patent infringement on April 23, 2013 (Dkt. #1).

WHEREAS, SmartData amended its complaint on July 18, 2013 (Dkt. #19).

WHEREAS, the parties have resolved their dispute with respect to all claims by SmartData against Roku.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that all claims brought by Plaintiff SmartData against Defendant Roku be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and the parties' Settlement Agreement, each party to bear its own costs and fees.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation,

IT IS ORDERED that all claims asserted against Defendant, ROKU, INC. by Plaintiff, SMARTDATA, S.A. are dismissed with prejudice; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer