MEDIA RIGHTS TECHNOLIGES, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, 5:13-cv-1916 PSG. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131203718
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO SHORTEN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ASSERTED CLAIMS THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants Media Rights Technologies, Inc. and Bluebeat, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to shorten the briefing schedule to [D.I. 44] Microsoft's Motion to Reduce the Number of Asserted Claims. The parties respectfully requests the following briefing schedule, which would al
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO SHORTEN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ASSERTED CLAIMS THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge. Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants Media Rights Technologies, Inc. and Bluebeat, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to shorten the briefing schedule to [D.I. 44] Microsoft's Motion to Reduce the Number of Asserted Claims. The parties respectfully requests the following briefing schedule, which would all..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO SHORTEN REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ASSERTED CLAIMS THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO
PAUL S. GREWAL, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants Media Rights Technologies, Inc. and Bluebeat, Inc. hereby stipulate and agree to shorten the briefing schedule to [D.I. 44] Microsoft's Motion to Reduce the Number of Asserted Claims.
The parties respectfully requests the following briefing schedule, which would allow the motion to be briefed and heard before the parties exchange invalidity contentions and claim construction positions:
Event Proposed Date
MRT's last day to file its response December 3, 2013
Microsoft's last day to file its reply December 6, 2013
Hearing on motion December 10, 2013, or as
soon thereafter as practicable
This stipulation will not result in prejudice to either party or otherwise cause any significant delay in this litigation.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained for the other signatories in this e-filed document.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
