Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MEDINA, 13-588 SI. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131210e18 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. The above-captioned case is currently scheduled for a status conference on December 11, 2013. However, counsel for the defendant will be travelling out of the district on that date. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the status conference be continued to December 17, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. Further, the parties stipulate and jointly request that time be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations from Decem
More

STIPULATED ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

The above-captioned case is currently scheduled for a status conference on December 11, 2013. However, counsel for the defendant will be travelling out of the district on that date. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the status conference be continued to December 17, 2013 at 11:00 a.m.

Further, the parties stipulate and jointly request that time be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculations from December 11 through December 17, 2013 for continuity of counsel.

The parties agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweighed the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161, and Crim. Loc. Rule 47-2(c), there are seventy (70) days remaining before the trial in this case must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, this matter shall be added to the Court's calendar on December 17, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. for a status conference.

In addition, for the reasons stated above, the Court finds that an exclusion of time from December 11 through December 17, 2013 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161, and Crim. Loc. Rule 47-2(c), there are seventy (70) days remaining before the trial in this case must commence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer