Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ESPARZA, CR 13-0554 JST. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131210e36 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. 3161 JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. The above-captioned matter is set on December 20, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before this Court for a status hearing. The parties had hoped that by December 20, 2013 the results of a cell phone download search and the drug test results from the Drug Enforcement Agency's crime lab would be completed. The cell phone download has been completed and will be produced to the defense this week. The DEA drug t
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

The above-captioned matter is set on December 20, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before this Court for a status hearing. The parties had hoped that by December 20, 2013 the results of a cell phone download search and the drug test results from the Drug Enforcement Agency's crime lab would be completed. The cell phone download has been completed and will be produced to the defense this week. The DEA drug test results, however, have not yet been completed. Additionally, defense counsel will be out of the office from December 30, 2013 to January 27, 2014. The parties are also presently in discussions regarding resolution of this case and need additional time. Lastly, the government has just recently been specially set for an evidentiary hearing on December 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in San Francisco which conflicts with the parties' next status in this case. Therefore, for all these reasons, the parties request that this Court continue the status hearing to February 14, 2014 so that the parties will have additional time to try to resolve the case and continue negotiations. On that date, it is anticipated that change of plea, motions, or trial will be set.

The Court has previously excluded the running of the speedy trial clock for effective preparation of counsel, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), through December 20, 2013. Therefore, the parties now request that the time between December 20, 2013 and February 14, 2014 be excluded from the running of the speedy trial clock for effective preparation of counsel, as well as to provide Mr. Esparza continuity of counsel, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties agree that, taking into account the public interest in prompt disposition of criminal cases, good cause exists for this extension due to the pending drug test results and the on-going discussions regarding resolution. The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO STIPULATED.

For the reasons stated above, this matter is continued until February 14, 2014, for a status hearing to set change of plea, motions, or trial. The Court finds that the exclusion of time from December 20, 2013 through February 14, 2014 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161 (h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance would deny the defendant effective preparation of counsel and continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer