BENZ v. THE CLOROX COMPANY, 13-cv-01361 WHO. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20131211870
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiff Carol Benz and Defendant The Clorox Company (the "parties"), pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(b), hereby request that the Court approve the following revised expert deadlines, to which the parties have stipulated. The parties seek to extend the period of time in which to designate initial and rebuttal experts and to conduct expert discovery. Extension of these deadlines will not affect a date of any hearing or p
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiff Carol Benz and Defendant The Clorox Company (the "parties"), pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(b), hereby request that the Court approve the following revised expert deadlines, to which the parties have stipulated. The parties seek to extend the period of time in which to designate initial and rebuttal experts and to conduct expert discovery. Extension of these deadlines will not affect a date of any hearing or pr..
More
STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DEADLINES
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carol Benz and Defendant The Clorox Company (the "parties"), pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(b), hereby request that the Court approve the following revised expert deadlines, to which the parties have stipulated. The parties seek to extend the period of time in which to designate initial and rebuttal experts and to conduct expert discovery. Extension of these deadlines will not affect a date of any hearing or proceeding on the Court's calendar and will not prejudice either party. The extensions of time sought are as follows:
1. The parties seek a revised deadline of January 15, 2014, by which to make initial expert designations/disclosures.
2. The parties seek a revised deadline of February 5, 2014, by which to make rebuttal expert designations/disclosures.
3. The parties seek a revised expert discovery cutoff of February 20, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Attestation: Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Susan W. Pangborn, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Dennis John Woodruff.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
