Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PRAGMATUS AV, LLC v. YAHOO! INC., 3-13-cv-01176-EMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131220d27 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING CERTAIN DEADLINES EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. On July 11, 2013, this Court issued a Case Management Order setting certain deadlines (Docket No. 25). The parties have agreed to the extension of certain deadlines as follows: • Initial Invalidity Contentions will be due December 9, 2013; and • Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction will be due December 16, 2013. The extension of these dates shall in no way interfere with the aspects of
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING CERTAIN DEADLINES

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

On July 11, 2013, this Court issued a Case Management Order setting certain deadlines (Docket No. 25). The parties have agreed to the extension of certain deadlines as follows:

• Initial Invalidity Contentions will be due December 9, 2013; and • Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction will be due December 16, 2013.

The extension of these dates shall in no way interfere with the aspects of the litigation and shall not impact any of the remaining dates set forth in this Court's Case Management Order.

THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(d), both parties stipulate to an extension of the deadlines as follows:

• Initial Invalidity Contentions will be due December 9, 2013; and • Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction will be due December 16, 2013.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer