Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OLIVER v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, CV 12-0943 RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140109e99 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION RE: SATISFACTION OF AWARD OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60, Plaintiff K. Oliver and Defendant Microsoft Corporation, through their designated counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS the Court granted Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment on August 5, 2013, and judgment was entered the same day. WHEREAS Defendant filed its Bill of Costs on August 19, 2013. WHEREAS the Clerk
More

STIPULATION RE: SATISFACTION OF AWARD OF COSTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60, Plaintiff K. Oliver and Defendant Microsoft Corporation, through their designated counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the Court granted Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment on August 5, 2013, and judgment was entered the same day.

WHEREAS Defendant filed its Bill of Costs on August 19, 2013.

WHEREAS the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs was entered on September 6, 2013.

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Motion to Review the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs on September 13, 2013.

WHEREAS the Court took under consideration Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs without oral argument and, to date, has not issued a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs.

WHEREAS the Parties agree that Plaintiff has fully and finally satisfied the award of costs issued in Defendant's favor by the Clerk of the Court on September 6, 2013.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs is withdrawn; and

2. Plaintiff has fully and finally satisfied the award of costs issued by the Clerk of the Court in this matter.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Review the Clerk's Order Taxing Costs is withdrawn; and

2. Plaintiff has fully and finally satisfied the award of costs issued by the Clerk of the Court in this matter.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer