Filed: Jan. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Martin Blaqmoor ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TracFone Wireless, Inc. ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, the Court related the above-entitled action to Hansell v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-03440-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (the " Hansell Action");
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Martin Blaqmoor ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TracFone Wireless, Inc. ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, the Court related the above-entitled action to Hansell v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-03440-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (the " Hansell Action"); W..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Martin Blaqmoor ("Plaintiff") and Defendant TracFone Wireless, Inc. ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, the Court related the above-entitled action to Hansell v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-03440-EMC (N.D. Cal.) (the "Hansell Action");
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2013, during the parties' Initial Case Management Conference in the Hansell Action, the Court ordered the following schedule on the Motion to Compel Arbitration in the Hansell Action:
1. 12/19/13: Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;
2. 1/23/14: Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;
3. 2/6/14: Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration Due;
4. 2/27/14 at 1:30 p.m.: Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration.
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration in the Hansell Action, and also sought leave to file a Motion to Compel Arbitration in the above-entitled action and in another related case, entitled Gandhi et al. v. TracFone Wireless, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-05296-EMC (N.D. Cal.);
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2013, the Court granted Defendant leave to file its Motion to Compel Arbitration in the above-entitled action (Dkt. No. 13), but didn't set a specific briefing schedule or a hearing for the motion;
WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that the same briefing schedule set for the Motion to Compel Arbitration in the Hansell action should apply to this action;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff, by his undersigned counsel, and Defendant, by its undersigned counsel, that the schedule on the arbitration motion in the Hansell Action also apply to this action, such that:
1. 1/23/14: Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration due;
2. 2/6/14: Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration due;
3. 2/27/14 at 1:30 p.m.: Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration.
ORDER
Pursuant to Stipulation, it is so ORDERED.
