Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NATIVE SONGBIRD CARE AND CONSERVATION v. FOXX, 13-cv-02265-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140108627 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Whereas Plaintiffs and Defendants are scheduled to file Summary Judgment Motions in this matter for reasons to be set forth in the Parties' motions, and in order to allow for additional time to bring settlement discussions to a close, the Parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule and hearing date for Defendants' motion for stay of proc
More

STIPULATION RE: SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[PROPOSED] ORDER

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Whereas Plaintiffs and Defendants are scheduled to file Summary Judgment Motions in this matter for reasons to be set forth in the Parties' motions, and in order to allow for additional time to bring settlement discussions to a close, the Parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule and hearing date for Defendants' motion for stay of proceedings:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served on or before January 13, 2013. 2. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served on or before January 31, 2013. 3. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served on or before February 7, 2013. 4. Defendants' Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served on or before February 14, 2013. 5. The hearing on the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment will remain unchanged for February 24, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

This revision of schedule does not alter the hearing date or the amount of time between the last brief and the hearing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The above stipulation is approved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer