Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ELLIS v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, C04 3341 EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140127773 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING (1) EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND (2) HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. STIPULATION The Plaintiffs have filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement and a motion for attorneys' fees. The Court has set a hearing date on the motion for preliminary approval for February 6, 2014. The Court has set a hearing date on the motion for attorn
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING (1) EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES RE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND (2) HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

STIPULATION

The Plaintiffs have filed a motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement and a motion for attorneys' fees.

The Court has set a hearing date on the motion for preliminary approval for February 6, 2014.

The Court has set a hearing date on the motion for attorneys' fees for March 13, 2014, with Costco's opposition due on January 24, 2014 and Plaintiffs' reply due on February 24, 2014.

The Parties submit that the briefing schedule and the hearing on the motion for attorneys' fees should be moved for two reasons. First, the Parties have been discussing information that may lead Costco not to oppose the motion. Additional time will allow those discussions to be completed. Second, the current hearing date of March 13, 2014, will come before class members will have the full period notice period to lodge objections to the fee request, as any notice to the class will not occur until sometime after the February 6 hearing date on the motion for preliminary approval. Thus, a modest relaxation of the current briefing and hearing dates may avoid unnecessary briefing and permit for a more streamlined hearing at a time when the Court will have more information available to it.

Therefore, Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Certified Classes and Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation stipulate as follows:

1. Costco's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now due on January 24, 2014, will be due on January 31, 2014. 2. Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now due on February 24, 2014, will be due on March 4, 2014. 3. The hearing on the motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now set for March 13, 2014, will be set at or near the time the Court will set for its hearing on a motion for final approval of the settlement, if the Court grants preliminary approval.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

The Court orders as follows:

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. Costco's opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now due on January 24, 2014, will be due on January 31, 2014. 2. Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now due on February 24, 2014, will be due on March 4, 2014. 3. The hearing on the motion for attorneys' fees and costs, now set for March 13, 2014, will be set at or near the time the Court will set for its hearing on a motion for final approval of the settlement, if the Court grants preliminary approval.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer