Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FINJAN, INC. v. FIREEYE, INC., CV13-03133-SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140221859 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO COMPLETE MEDIATION SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. RECITALS Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12, and ADR Local Rule 6-5, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and Defendant FireEye, Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following request to extend the deadline for the Parties to complete mediation: WHEREAS, on September 23, 2013 the Court granted
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF THE DEADLINE FOR THE PARTIES TO COMPLETE MEDIATION

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

RECITALS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-12, and ADR Local Rule 6-5, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. and Defendant FireEye, Inc. (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following request to extend the deadline for the Parties to complete mediation:

WHEREAS, on September 23, 2013 the Court granted the Parties' stipulation to select mediation as the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process, to be completed by the presumptive deadline of December 23, 2013 (Dkt. No. 20);

WHEREAS, on December 5, 2013, the ADR Office notified the Parties that the mediator then assigned to the case, Julie Mar-Spinola, was unable to conduct the mediation due to a family emergency and vacated the appointment of Ms. Mar-Spinola as mediator for this case (email from Alice Fiel (ADR Case Administrator); Dkt. Nos. 44-45);

WHEREAS, on December 13, 2013, the Court appointed Shirish Gupta as mediator for this case (Dkt. No. 46);

WHEREAS, on December 16, 2013, the Court entered an Order to extend the mediation deadline from December 23, 2013 to February 28, 2014, due to the need to accommodate the process of assigning a new mediator to the case (Dkt. No. 48);

WHEREAS, on January 2, 2014, the Court issued a notice continuing the initial case management conference in this action from January 9, 2014 to March 12, 2014 (Dkt. No. 49);

WHEREAS, on February 14, 2014, the Parties had a pre-mediation phone conference with Shirish Gupta, during which the parties agreed that, due to the extension in the case schedule, mediation would be more productive at a later date following the initial case management conference;

WHEREAS, the requested extension of time should not have any material effect on the schedule in this case.

STIPULATION

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the deadline for the Parties to complete mediation be extended from February 28, 2014 to April 28, 2014.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The deadline for the Parties to complete mediation in this matter is extended from February 28, 2014 to April 28, 2014.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer