Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 1913. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140310438 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER REGARDING TIME TO BRING MOTIONS TO COMPEL BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD. DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. Whereas, the presently scheduled discovery cut-off ordered by the Court is January 31, 2014; Whereas, Local Rule 37-3 for the Northern District of California requires the filing of any motions to compel within seven (7) days after the discovery cut-off; Whereas, on December 30, 2014, Plaintiffs served Defendant Cathay P
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIME TO BRING MOTIONS TO COMPEL BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD.

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

Whereas, the presently scheduled discovery cut-off ordered by the Court is January 31, 2014;

Whereas, Local Rule 37-3 for the Northern District of California requires the filing of any motions to compel within seven (7) days after the discovery cut-off;

Whereas, on December 30, 2014, Plaintiffs served Defendant Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. ("Cathay Pacific"), with Requests for Admission;

Whereas, on January 22, 2014, Defendant Cathay Pacific requested a two week extension to respond to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admission until February 12, 2014;

Whereas, Plaintiffs agreed to provide the two week extension contingent upon Cathay Pacific's agreement that Plaintiffs' could bring any motion to compel the Requests because of an inadequate response or otherwise after February 7, 2014 — the time period contemplated by Local Rule 37-3.

Now therefore, counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendant Cathay Pacific hereby stipulate as follows:

Cathay Pacific shall have until February 12, 2014 to respond to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions;

Plaintiffs shall have until February 19, 2014 to bring a motion to compel or other discovery dispute to the Court's attention concerning Cathay Pacific's responses to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions.

GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION

I, Steven N. Williams, hereby attest, pursuant to Northern District of California, Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer