Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marroquin v. Ashron Construction & Restoration, Inc., 13-CV-00421 (HRL). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140310879 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and VINCENT DE LA TORRE and Defendants ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.; EZRA COHEN; and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants met and conferred regarding potential amendments and revisions to the Complaint in order to facilitate settlement proceedings; 2. WHEREAS, the
More

STIPULATION FOR FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs CESAR GONZALEZ MARROQUIN and VINCENT DE LA TORRE and Defendants ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.; EZRA COHEN; and U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants met and conferred regarding potential amendments and revisions to the Complaint in order to facilitate settlement proceedings;

2. WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint, which removes some factual allegations only, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

3. WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants waive notice and service of the Second Amended Complaint and shall not be required to answer the amendment.

4. WHERAS, the parties agree that this amendment will not necessitate any modifications of deadlines already set by the Court.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties jointly request that the Court grant leave to the Plaintiffs to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on GOOD CAUSE shown, leave to file the Second Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A to the stipulation is hereby granted. Defendants do not need to file an Answer as the Answer on file is deemed the responsive pleading. This amendment shall also not modify any deadlines already set by this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer