Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, C 12-02511 SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140326b01 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSALS AND ORDER THEREON SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following dismissals: 1. The County of Alameda is dismissed with prejudice from the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint. The County of Alameda is not dismissed from the Sixth Claim for Relief. 2. Defendant Lieutenant Thomas F. Madigan is dismissed with
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSALS AND ORDER THEREON

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following dismissals:

1. The County of Alameda is dismissed with prejudice from the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint. The County of Alameda is not dismissed from the Sixth Claim for Relief. 2. Defendant Lieutenant Thomas F. Madigan is dismissed with prejudice from each and every Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint and shall no longer be a party to this action. 3. All defendants are dismissed with prejudice from the First Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint, except for Defendant Kevin H. Estep. 4. All defendants are dismissed with prejudice from the Third Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint, except for Defendant Justin Miguel.

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The County of Alameda is dismissed with prejudice from the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Claims for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint. The County of Alameda is not dismissed from the Sixth Claim for Relief. 2. Defendant Lieutenant Thomas F. Madigan is dismissed with prejudice from each and every Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint and shall no longer be a party to this action. 3. All defendants are dismissed with prejudice from the First Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint, except for Defendant Kevin H. Estep. 4. All defendants are dismissed with prejudice from the Third Claim for Relief as stated in the Second Amended Complaint, except for Defendant Justin Miguel.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer