Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 1917. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140331a38
Filed: Mar. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TECHNOLOGIES DISPLAYS AMERICAS, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corp. and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") enter into this Stipulation with Technologies Displays Americas LLC ("TDA") concerning the matter entitled Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173, which was related to In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitr
More

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TECHNOLOGIES DISPLAYS AMERICAS, LLC TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sharp Electronics Corp. and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. (collectively, "Sharp") enter into this Stipulation with Technologies Displays Americas LLC ("TDA") concerning the matter entitled Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173, which was related to In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-cv-05944, by an Order of Judge Samuel Conti on March 26, 2013. See Case No. 13-cv-1173, Dkt. No. 15.

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, on March 15, 2013, Sharp filed a complaint in the Northern District of California alleging antitrust violations by manufacturers, distributors and sellers of CRTs, captioned Sharp Electronics Corp., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 13-cv-01173;

WHEREAS, on October 28, 2013, Sharp filed its First Amended Complaint ("FAC");

WHEREAS, on November 22, 2013, TDA moved to dismiss the FAC;

WHEREAS, on March 13, 2014, the Court granted in part and denied in part TDA's motion (MDL Dkt. 2438);

WHEREAS, TDA's time to answer the FAC would otherwise expire on March 27, 2014;

WHEREAS, counsel for Sharp and TDA have agreed that TDA will answer, on or before April 25, 2014, those claims for relief in the FAC that have not been dismissed;

NOW, THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-1(a), SHARP AND TDA, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

The deadline for TDA to answer the FAC, to the extent not dismissed, shall be extended until April 25, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer