BONILLAS v. UNITED AIR LINES INC., C-12-06574 SBA (EDL). (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140403833
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge. The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed orders regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Document Production and Interrogatory Answers. The parties have a dispute as to production of documents in response to Requests for Production of Documents numbers 7 and 11. The number of positions for which Plaintiff still seeks documents relating to the Talent and Selection hiring process is excessive, but it is unclear whether documents regarding
Summary: ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge. The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed orders regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Document Production and Interrogatory Answers. The parties have a dispute as to production of documents in response to Requests for Production of Documents numbers 7 and 11. The number of positions for which Plaintiff still seeks documents relating to the Talent and Selection hiring process is excessive, but it is unclear whether documents regarding ..
More
ORDER
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Chief Magistrate Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed orders regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Document Production and Interrogatory Answers. The parties have a dispute as to production of documents in response to Requests for Production of Documents numbers 7 and 11. The number of positions for which Plaintiff still seeks documents relating to the Talent and Selection hiring process is excessive, but it is unclear whether documents regarding a few additional positions beyond the three identified by Defendant is justified. The parties shall file a joint letter setting forth no more than three additional positions. The joint letter shall be filed no later than April 7, 2014 and shall not exceed five pages. The letter shall contain each party's position as to why documents regarding any positions beyond the three identified by Defendant are or are not relevant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
