EJT TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., C 13-5112 PJH. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140403836
Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service on the opposing party thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service on the opposing party thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall s..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service on the opposing party thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty-day period.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
