Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BETANCOURT, 12-CR-00233-DLJ. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140410924 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTING DATE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge. Defendant Claudio Betancourt through defense counsel Steve Emery Teich and the United States government through Assistant United States Attorney Jeff Nedrow stipulate as follows: Defendant is currently in state custody on a pending matter, and was recently held to answer following a preliminary hearing to the charge of murder, in violation of California Penal Code
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTING DATE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge.

Defendant Claudio Betancourt through defense counsel Steve Emery Teich and the United States government through Assistant United States Attorney Jeff Nedrow stipulate as follows:

Defendant is currently in state custody on a pending matter, and was recently held to answer following a preliminary hearing to the charge of murder, in violation of California Penal Code § 187 the defendant is currently negotiating a potential pretrial resolution to the state charge, and requests additional time to continue those negotiations. The defense continues to request, and the government agrees, that the federal matter should, for now trail the pending state matter. It is the expectation of the parties that should the state matter resolve pretrial, a resolution in the federal case would be likely

Therefore the parties stipulate and agree that the hearing date currently scheduled for April 10, 2014 be continued to June 12, 2014. The parties stipulate that the time period from April 10, 2014 through June 12, 2014 be continued to April 10, 2014, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § '3161(h)(1(B) and (h)(3)(A) on account of the unavailability of the defendant due to the pending state charges, as well to ensure continuity of counsel and in the interest of justice, pursuant to § 3161(h)(7)(A). A proposed order is attached.

ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTING DATE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the setting date scheduled for April 10, 2014 before Judge Jensen is vacated and that the new setting date is set for June 12, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. The Court further finds that the ends of justice that will be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the current stipulation and the parties' January 29, 2013 stipulation, the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is EXCLUDED during the time period from April 10, 2014, through June 12, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), due to the need to provide defendant with continuity of counsel, as well as the defendant's unavailability as a result of pending state charges, and in the interests of justice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer