Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Emblaze Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 3:12-cv-05422-JST. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140411777 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME IN CONNECTION WITH MICROSOFT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COHEN & GRESSER LLP AS COUNSEL FOR EMBLAZE LTD. JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. This stipulation is made between Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. ("Emblaze") and Defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), by and through their respective counsel. The parties herein agree and stipulate as follows: 1. Emblaze's time to file a Response to Microsoft's Motion to Disqualify Cohen & Gresser LLP as Counsel for Embl
More

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER ENLARGING TIME IN CONNECTION WITH MICROSOFT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COHEN & GRESSER LLP AS COUNSEL FOR EMBLAZE LTD.

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

This stipulation is made between Plaintiff Emblaze Ltd. ("Emblaze") and Defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"), by and through their respective counsel. The parties herein agree and stipulate as follows:

1. Emblaze's time to file a Response to Microsoft's Motion to Disqualify Cohen & Gresser LLP as Counsel for Emblaze Ltd. (D.E. #66), which is currently scheduled for April 18, 2014, shall be extended to May 1, 2014.

2. Microsoft's time to file a Reply in support of its Motion to Disqualify, which is currently due April 25, 2014, shall be extended to May 14, 2014.

3. The parties do not anticipate that the requested extension will have an effect on the schedule in this case, or on the hearing date of May 29, 2014 requested by Microsoft.

4. The previous time modifications in this case are as follows: A Case Management Conference had originally been scheduled for February 11, 2013 (D.E. #21), before being vacated and reset to February 25, 2013, and subsequently being vacated pursuant to a Reassignment Order (D.E. #30). Subsequent to the Clerk's Notice Setting Case Management Conference (D.E. #37), the parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting an Extension for the Case Management Conference (D.E. #38), and an extension of 14 days was granted (D.E. #39). A Joint Statement Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction Briefing had originally been scheduled for August 27, 2013. (D.E. #47). The parties filed a Joint Stipulation Requesting an Extension for Filing Statement Proposing Schedules for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction Briefing (D.E. #48), and an extension of 2 days was granted (D.E. #49). A technology tutorial had originally been scheduled for October 29, 2013 and a claims construction hearing had originally been scheduled for November 12, 2013. (D.E. #42). Pursuant to Court Order (D.E. #57), the tutorial was continued to December 16, 2013 and the claims construction hearing was continued to December 18, 2013. Pursuant to Court Order (D.E. #60), the tutorial was subsequently continued to February 4, 2014 and the claims construction hearing was continued to February 6, 2014. Pursuant to Clerk's Notice (D.E. #61), the tutorial was continued to March 3, 2014 and the claims construction hearing continued to March 5, 2014. Pursuant to Clerk's Notice (D.E. #62), the tutorial was continued to June 9, 2014 and the claims construction hearing was continued to June 11, 2014.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer