Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IBIZ, LLC v. CITY OF HAYWARD, CV 13 1537 SC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140415779 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE OF CMC SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. COME NOW PLAINTIFF IBIZ AND DEFENDANT CITY AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-10(c), Plaintiff IBIZ, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "IBIZ") and Defendant the City of Hayward ("Defendant" or the "City") hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to continue the Case Management Conference presently set in this Court for April 18, 2014 at 10 a.m. to June 13, 2014, at 10 a.m., and to refer
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE OF CMC

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

COME NOW PLAINTIFF IBIZ AND DEFENDANT CITY AND STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Pursuant to Local Rule 16-10(c), Plaintiff IBIZ, LLC ("Plaintiff" or "IBIZ") and Defendant the City of Hayward ("Defendant" or the "City") hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to continue the Case Management Conference presently set in this Court for April 18, 2014 at 10 a.m. to June 13, 2014, at 10 a.m., and to refer the parties to a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge to be held approximately 150 days from the date of the Court's order for the purpose of resolving the parties' attorney fee dispute.

As the Court is aware, the merits of this case are now moot and the only outstanding issue to be resolved relates to Plaintiff I Biz's entitlement to attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988. (Doc. 55). The parties participated in an ADR teleconference with the Court's ADR staff on April 10, 2014 during which the parties indicated that they would work diligently and in good faith to resolve the attorney fee issue informally so that Court resources would not be unnecessarily expended to resolve the issue. ADR staff proposed that, in order to allow the parties sufficient time to engage in good faith negotiations regarding the attorney fee matter, a recommendation would be made to this Court to refer the matter for a settlement conference to be held before a Magistrate Judge approximately 150 days from the date of the teleconference in the event the parties are unsuccessful in resolving the fee dispute informally. The parties are agreeable to that arrangement.

STIPULATION

Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE as follows:

(1) The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. is continued to June 13, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. or to any other time that is convenient for the Court; (2) The resolution of the attorney fee dispute will be referred for a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge to be held approximately 150 days from the date of the Court's Order regarding this Stipulation.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court enters the following orders:

(1) The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 18, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. September 19, 2014 is continued to June 13, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.; (2) The resolution of the attorney fee dispute will be referred for a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge to be held approximately 150 days from the date of the Court's Order regarding this Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer