APPLE, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 12-CV-00630-LHK. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140423921
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Samsung has filed objections to Apple's disclosures. ECF No. 1740. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1741-3. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung's objections as follows: Exhibit COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION Number Samsung's Overruled. "insuff
Summary: ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Samsung has filed objections to Apple's disclosures. ECF No. 1740. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1741-3. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung's objections as follows: Exhibit COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION Number Samsung's Overruled. "insuffi..
More
ORDER ON SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S DISCLOSURES
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Samsung has filed objections to Apple's disclosures. ECF No. 1740. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1741-3. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung's objections as follows:
Exhibit COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION
Number
Samsung's Overruled.
"insufficient
identification"
of disclosures
objection
Dr. Cockburn
Witness Overruled.
objection
PDX 97.103 Sustained. Apple may use the slide but must delete the last sentence: "PTO ruled
(Neonode and `721 valid."
Plaisant slide)
PDX 97.124 Sustained. Dr. Cockburn may not testify as to any opinion that Xrgomics fails to
(Xrgomics disclose the claim limitation that "the current character string in the first area is
slide) replaced with the suggested replacement character string if the user performs a
gesture on the suggested replacement character string in the second area" but
may testify as to his opinion that Xrgomics fails to disclose the claim limitation
that "the current character string in the first area is replaced with the suggested
replacement character string if the user activates a key on the keyboard
associated with a delimiter."
Mr. Maccoun
Improper Overruled.
Rebuttal
objection
(Maccoun may
not testify
regarding
Google and
Samsung)
PX 2003 (letter Sustained.
from Samsung
to Google)
PX 2004 (letter Sustained.
from Google to
Samsung)
Dr. Mowry
Witness Overruled.
objection:
violation of
case narrowing
Witness Overruled.
objection: new
infringement
theory on
rebuttal
Witness Sustained.
objection: Rule
26 (Secondary
considerations)
Dr. Snoeren
Witness Sustained.
objection
(opinion on
GSA 2.7)
Samsung requests to seal various documents. ECF No. 1740. Having considered Samsung's motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court rules on the sealing requests as follows:
Request Court's Ruling
PDX92.86 GRANTED.
PDX92.86A GRANTED.
SDX3792 GRANTED.
JX 50A GRANTED.
(SAMNDCA630-
SC00057553-87;
SAMNDCA630-
SC00057951-57;
SAMNDCA630-
SC00057958-75).
The parties shall
renumber this
exhibit.
PX 2003 GRANTED.
PX 2004 GRANTED.
DX314A GRANTED.
(MSFT_Code
170-416, 1127-1666,
2023-2025,
2089-2803, 2956-2957).
Source: Leagle
