Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bastidas v. Good Samaritan Hospital LP, C-13-4388-SI. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140424875 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS, on March 13, 2014, the Court granted the separate Motions to Dismiss of Good Samaritan Hospital LP, Samaritan LLC, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff, Bruce G. Wilbur. M.D. and Steven M. Schwartz, M.D. ("Good Samaritan Defendants") and HCA Inc. ("HCA, and collectively with the Good Samaritan Defendants, the "Defendants") as to Plaintiff's First Amend
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on March 13, 2014, the Court granted the separate Motions to Dismiss of Good Samaritan Hospital LP, Samaritan LLC, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Staff, Bruce G. Wilbur. M.D. and Steven M. Schwartz, M.D. ("Good Samaritan Defendants") and HCA Inc. ("HCA, and collectively with the Good Samaritan Defendants, the "Defendants") as to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, with leave to amend certain causes of action [Docket No. 56]; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on April 16, 2014 [Docket No. 60]; and

WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the pertinent legal and factual issues, and current conflicts of counsel on other matters, the parties have stipulated to an extension until May 12, 2014 for the Defendants to file responses to the Second Amended Complaint; and

WHEREAS, the parties agree that this modification to the date by which Defendants are required to respond to the Second Amended Complaint will not affect any other current deadlines in this case.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the parties hereto, with the Court's permission, that the date by which the Defendants shall serve their responses to the Second Amended Complaint is May 12, 2014.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer