Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VISTA v. USPLABS, LLC, 5:14-cv-378-HRL. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140425651 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS USPLABS, LLC, JONATHAN VINCENT DOYLE, JACOB GEISSLER, USPLABS OXYELITE, LLC USPLABS OXYELITE PN, LLC, AND GNC CORPORATION TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CONTINUING INITIAL ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [L.R. 6-1(a)] [Re: Dkt. No. 12] HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, defendants USPLabs, LLC, Jonathan Vincent Doyle, Jacob Geissler a/k/a/Jacobo Geissler, USPLabs Oxyelite, LLC, USPLabs OxyE
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS USPLABS, LLC, JONATHAN VINCENT DOYLE, JACOB GEISSLER, USPLABS OXYELITE, LLC USPLABS OXYELITE PN, LLC, AND GNC CORPORATION TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND CONTINUING INITIAL ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [L.R. 6-1(a)] [Re: Dkt. No. 12]

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, defendants USPLabs, LLC, Jonathan Vincent Doyle, Jacob Geissler a/k/a/Jacobo Geissler, USPLabs Oxyelite, LLC, USPLabs OxyElite PN, LLC, and GNC Corporation ("Defendants") and plaintiff Roel Vista ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on or about January 24, 2014;

WHEREAS Defendants were purportedly served on April 7, 2014;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants' responsive pleading is due on April 28, 2014;

WHEREAS good cause exists for this extension. Due to the complexity of this litigation, as shown by the Complaint which contains 169 paragraphs and 11 causes of action, as well as multiple cases that may be related to this action, Defendants need additional time to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS changing the responsive pleading deadline will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

THEREFORE, the parties stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), to extend the date to file a responsive pleading from April 28, 2014 up to and including May 28, 2014 (a 30 day extension).

I, Michael Partos, pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory, which shall serve in lieu of the signatories' signatures on the document

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. The Initial Case Management Conference set for May 20, 2014 (Dkt. 4, Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines) is continued to June 24, 2014, 1:30 p.m. Related deadlines are adjusted accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer