Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

APPLE, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 12-CV-00630-LHK. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140429a93 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. I. SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S CLOSING SLIDES Samsung has filed objections to Apple's Closing Slides. ECF No. 1830-1. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1829. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung's objections as follows: SAMSUNG'S COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION O
More

ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

I. SAMSUNG'S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE'S CLOSING SLIDES

Samsung has filed objections to Apple's Closing Slides. ECF No. 1830-1. Apple has filed a response. ECF No. 1829. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Samsung's objections as follows:

SAMSUNG'S COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION OBJECTION Slide 28 Overruled. Slides 38, 39, Overruled. 56, 57, 58 Slide 40 Overruled. Slide 51 Overruled. Slides 56-58 Overruled. Slide 90 Overruled. Slide 101 Overruled. Slide 108 Sustained as to the first question and answer, which comprise the first six lines of the transcript excerpt. Overruled as to the remainder. Slide 112 Sustained. Counsel may not use this slide but may discuss Samsung's statement in opening that Samsung was awarded the second highest number of patents in 2013 after IBM.

II. APPLE'S OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG'S CLOSING SLIDES

Apple has filed objections to Samsung's Closing Slides. ECF No. 1829. Samsung has filed a response. ECF No. 1830-1. After reviewing the parties' briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on Apple's objections as follows:

APPLE'S COURT'S RULING ON OBJECTION OBJECTION Slide 16 Sustained. Slides 18, 119 Overruled. Slide 21 Overruled. Slide 30 Overruled. Slide 35 Overruled. Slides 42, 116 Overruled. Slide 43A Overruled. Slide 53 Sustained. Slides 54, 103, Overruled. 110 Slides 55, 61, Overruled. 87, 88 Slides 57, 92 Overruled. Slide 58 Sustained as to bottom two screenshots. Overruled as to top screenshot. Slide 60 Overruled. Slide 80 Overruled. Slide 90 Overruled. Slide 91 Sustained as to bottom two screenshots. Overruled as to top screenshot. Slide 97 Overruled. Slide 109 Overruled. Slides 114-115 Overruled.

III. SEALING

Samsung requests to seal various closing slides. ECF No. 1830-1. Having considered Samsung's motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following slides as follows:

Apple Slides COURT'S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST 46 GRANTED. 47 GRANTED. 91 GRANTED. 97-101 GRANTED. 106 GRANTED. 107 GRANTED. Samsung COURT'S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST Slides 1 GRANTED. 4 GRANTED. 5 GRANTED. 7 GRANTED. 21 GRANTED. 25 GRANTED. 66 GRANTED. 67 GRANTED. 71 GRANTED. Fazio GRANTED. Declaration Exhibit D

Apple requests to seal various closing slides. ECF No. 1829. Having considered Apple's motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following slides as follows:

Apple Slides COURT'S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST 84 GRANTED. 87 GRANTED. 88 GRANTED. 94 GRANTED. 95 GRANTED. 106 GRANTED. 107 GRANTED. 117 GRANTED. Samsung COURT'S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST Slides 66 GRANTED. 67 GRANTED. 71 GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer