Hewlett-Packard Company v. Servicenow, Inc., 14-cv-00570 (BLF). (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140502h89
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") and defendant ServiceNow, Inc. ("ServiceNow") stipulate to and respectfully ask the Court to reschedule the early Case Management Conference that is currently scheduled for May 21, 2014, to June 26, 2014, or the earliest date thereafter that is convenient to the Court. Good cause exists for this requested relief, due to a schedul
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") and defendant ServiceNow, Inc. ("ServiceNow") stipulate to and respectfully ask the Court to reschedule the early Case Management Conference that is currently scheduled for May 21, 2014, to June 26, 2014, or the earliest date thereafter that is convenient to the Court. Good cause exists for this requested relief, due to a scheduli..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
BETH L. FREEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") and defendant ServiceNow, Inc. ("ServiceNow") stipulate to and respectfully ask the Court to reschedule the early Case Management Conference that is currently scheduled for May 21, 2014, to June 26, 2014, or the earliest date thereafter that is convenient to the Court.
Good cause exists for this requested relief, due to a scheduling conflict identified by HP, as set forth in the accompanying declaration of Nathan L. Walker in support of this stipulated request.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
