Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CONNOLLY v. SANTA CRUZ SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, 5:13-cv-05714 EJD. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140508a13 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 07, 2014
Latest Update: May 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. On December 18, 2013, the court issued an order which scheduled the above-entitled action for a Case Management Conference on May 9, 2014, and required the parties to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before May 2, 2014. See Docket Item No. 5. Defendants and Third Party Defendant filed their own Joint Case Management Statement in response to the order after attempting to obtain Plaintiff's input. See Docket Item No
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

On December 18, 2013, the court issued an order which scheduled the above-entitled action for a Case Management Conference on May 9, 2014, and required the parties to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before May 2, 2014. See Docket Item No. 5. Defendants and Third Party Defendant filed their own Joint Case Management Statement in response to the order after attempting to obtain Plaintiff's input. See Docket Item No. 22. As of the date and time this order was filed, Plaintiff has not complied.

It appears that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by May 21, 2014, file a Case Management Conference Statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court.

In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 9, 2014, is VACATED and will be reset by the court if necessary. In addition, this action, including all matters related to discovery, are STAYED pending resolution of the Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer