Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP. v. BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD., 4:13-CV-05184 SBA. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140513a17 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES BY THIRTY (30) DAYS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and 7-12, Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation ("TLC") and Defendant Blackmagic Design PTY LTD. ("Blackmagic") (collectively "the parties") hereby stipulate to extend Blackmagic's deadlines under Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 by 30 days. WHEREAS TLC served its Patent Local Rule 3-1 infringement contentions on March 6, 2014. Pursuant to Paten
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES BY THIRTY (30) DAYS

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a) and 7-12, Plaintiff Technology Licensing Corporation ("TLC") and Defendant Blackmagic Design PTY LTD. ("Blackmagic") (collectively "the parties") hereby stipulate to extend Blackmagic's deadlines under Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4 by 30 days.

WHEREAS TLC served its Patent Local Rule 3-1 infringement contentions on March 6, 2014. Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3 and 3-4, and the Joint Proposed Case Management Order (ECF No. 59), Blackmagic's invalidity contentions are currently due April 21, 2014.

WHEREAS Blackmagic proposed the parties agree to limit the number of asserted claims in this case and the number of prior art references, however TLC has not yet agreed to limit the number of claims. Blackmagic intends to move for an Order directing TLC to limit the number of claims it asserts against Blackmagic, before Blackmagic is required to serve its invalidity contentions under the Patent Local Rules.

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Blackmagic to serve its invalidity contentions so Blackmagic may seek an Order before its contentions are due.

WHEREAS no schedule has been set in this case. Therefore, the schedule previously proposed by the parties (ECF No. 59) should be modified as set forth in Exhibit A.

BLACKMAGIC AND TLC HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

Blackmagic's deadlines under Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 shall be extended 30 days, and Blackmagic's Invalidity Contentions are now due May 21. The parties further stipulate that the schedule previously submitted by the parties (ECF No. 59) is withdrawn and the Amended Joint Proposed Case Schedule attached as Exhibit A shall be submitted to the Court for consideration.

Exhibit A

Amended Joint Proposed Case Schedule

Previously Amended Proposed Event Proposed Dates Deadlines (ECF No. 59) April 21, 2014 May 21, 2014 Serve "Invalidity Contentions." (PLR 3-3). Produce documents to accompany "Invalidity Contentions." (PLR 3-4). May 5, 2014 June 9, 2014 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction. (PLR 4-1). May 26, 2014 June 30, 2014 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction and Extrinsic Evidence. (PLR 4-2). June 20, 2014 July 21, 2014 File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement. (PLR 4-3). July 21, 2014 August 20, 2014 Complete Claim Construction discovery. (PLR-4-4). August 4, 2014 September 4, 2014 Opening claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5). August 18, 2014 September 22, 2014 Responsive claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5). August 25, 2014 October 2, 2014 Reply claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5). October 17, 2014 October 17, 2014 2 Binders of each sides presentation slides for Claim construction hearing due. October 23, 2014, October 23, 2014, Claim construction hearing. (PLR 4-6). 10:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 50 days after the 50 days after the Advice of counsel defense discovery due. (PLR 3-7). Court's service of Court's service of the claim the claim construction ruling construction ruling TBD TBD Close of fact discovery. TBD TBD Designation of expert witnesses and exchange of initial reports for party with burden of proof. TBD TBD Exchange of rebuttal expert reports. TBD TBD Close of expert discovery. TBD TBD Dispositive motions and motions re experts due. TBD TBD Pretrial conference.

ATTESTATION

I, Laurie M. Charrington, an ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO EXTEND PATENT LOCAL RULE DEADLINES BY THIRTY (30) DAYS, in compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), hereby attest that Joseph N. Hosteny, attorney for Technology Licensing Corp., has concurred with this filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer