Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PACHECO v. WebBANK, 5:13-cv-05964 PSG. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140521834 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEFENDANTS TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiff Patricia G. Pacheco ("Plaintiff") and Defendants WebBank and Dell Financial Services, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff's complaint on February 4, 2014. On February 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike certain affirmative defenses from Defendants' answer. (Dkt. 16). Pursuant to Rule
More

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEFENDANTS TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Patricia G. Pacheco ("Plaintiff") and Defendants WebBank and Dell Financial Services, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff's complaint on February 4, 2014.

On February 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike certain affirmative defenses from Defendants' answer. (Dkt. 16).

Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants may amend their answer with written consent from Plaintiff or leave of court.

Plaintiff has reviewed a draft of Defendants' proposed amended answer and consents to Defendants filing of the amendment. Plaintiff agrees to withdraw her Motion to Strike.

Now, therefore, the Parties stipulate and agree, rather than filing an opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, Defendants will file an amended answer on or before March 17, 2014.

It is so stipulated.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The 4/10/14 Motion to strike hearing is vacated.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer