U.S. v. DUNN, CR 13-00287 JST. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140528b80
Visitors: 47
Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. The parties hereto have been engaged in discussions with regard to the settlement of this matter. However, they have not yet reached agreement. The parties believe that additional time will be helpful in a resolution of the matter to the satisfaction of each party. WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the matter of RONNELL DUNN may be continued for approximately thirty days to a new date convenien
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. The parties hereto have been engaged in discussions with regard to the settlement of this matter. However, they have not yet reached agreement. The parties believe that additional time will be helpful in a resolution of the matter to the satisfaction of each party. WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the matter of RONNELL DUNN may be continued for approximately thirty days to a new date convenient..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
The parties hereto have been engaged in discussions with regard to the settlement of this matter. However, they have not yet reached agreement. The parties believe that additional time will be helpful in a resolution of the matter to the satisfaction of each party.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the matter of RONNELL DUNN may be continued for approximately thirty days to a new date convenient with the court and counsel, which is suggested to be April 25, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. The Court will set a trial date at that time.
The parties further stipulate and agree that the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161, is called for because the requested continuance is needed to allow counsel sufficient time to prepare and that the failure to grant the continuance requested would unreasonably deny counsel the time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
Dated: March 19, 2014 _/s/_Acadia Sense _____
ACADIA SENSE
Asst. U.S. Attorney
[PROPOSED] ORDER
On the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter before the court on March 28, 2014 is continued to April 25, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. for further status.
Source: Leagle
