Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. SEBELIUS, 3:14CV1345 SC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140602917 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 30, 2014
Latest Update: May 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Federal Defendants 1 and Plaintiff Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the initial case management conference, as follows: 1. On March 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed its complaint in this matter; 2. On March 25, 2014, the Cour
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the Northern District of California, Federal Defendants1 and Plaintiff Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to continue the initial case management conference, as follows:

1. On March 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed its complaint in this matter;

2. On March 25, 2014, the Court set this matter for an initial case management conference on June 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte;

3. On April 22, 2014, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Samuel Conti and all then-scheduled dates were vacated;

4. On April 24, 2014, the Court set this matter for an initial case management conference on June 20, 2014, at 10:00 am before the Honorable Samuel Conti;

5. On May 16, 2014, the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California was served with a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint by personal service;

6. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(2), Federal Defendants' response to the Complaint is due to be filed and served on July 15, 2014;

7. Because the U.S. Attorney's Office was just recently served with the Complaint in this action, and the Federal Defendants' response is not due until after the initial case management conference as currently scheduled, Federal Defendants and Plaintiff jointly request that the initial case management conference be continued to August 8, 2014, at 10:00 am for all parties;

8. No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and

9. This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court order, other than the date for the initial case management conference.

THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the June 20, 2014 case management conference until August 8, 2014, at 10:00 am.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The initial case management conference currently set for June 20, 2014 is continued to August 8, 2014 at 10:00 am.

FootNotes


2. I, Erica Blachman Hitchings, hereby attest that I obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document of all signatories whose signatures are represented by/s/.
1. Undersigned counsel for Federal Defendants are appearing for the sole purpose of this stipulated continuance request and are not waiving any defenses. At the present time, "Federal Defendants" includes all named defendants except HealthDataInsights, Inc., Palmetto GBA, LLC, and Maximus Federal Services, Inc. These entities are contractors and have not yet been served with the Complaint.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer