Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LORD ABBETT MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC. v. ASAMI, C-12-03694-DMR (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140606b04 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DENYING ENLARGEMENT OF PAGE LIMITATIONS FOR REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund, Inc. on behalf of its series Lord Abbett High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, a Maryland corporation ("Lord Abbett"), Stone & Youngberg LLC ("S&Y) and Defendants Joann Asami, Thomas Beach, Jane Breyer, Jennifer Campbell, Oren Cheyette, Lynn De Jonghe, Roz Hamar, Tim Moppin, Gina Moreland, Jennifer Ville
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER DENYING ENLARGEMENT OF PAGE LIMITATIONS FOR REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund, Inc. on behalf of its series Lord Abbett High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, a Maryland corporation ("Lord Abbett"), Stone & Youngberg LLC ("S&Y) and Defendants Joann Asami, Thomas Beach, Jane Breyer, Jennifer Campbell, Oren Cheyette, Lynn De Jonghe, Roz Hamar, Tim Moppin, Gina Moreland, Jennifer Villeneuve, and Valerie McCann Woodson (collectively "the Board Members"), respectfully submit this Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Page Limitations for Reply Briefs in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment and state as follows:

1. On April 28, 2014, S&Y filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. On May 1, 2014, the Board Members filed their Motion for Summary Judgment.

2. On May 16, 2014, the Court granted Lord Abbett's Motion to File an Omnibus Response to S&Y's and the Board Member's Motions for Summary Judgment and extended the page limitations on the Omnibus Response from 25 to 45 pages.

3. On May 27, Lord Abbett filed its Omnibus Response which was 45 pages in length.

4. S&Y and the Board Members seek an extension of the page limitations for their Reply Briefs from 15 to 20 pages. Lord Abbett does not object to this request.

S&Y and the Board Members respectfully request the Court grant the stipulated request as set forth above. A proposed form of Order is attached for the Court's consideration.

ORDER

The Parties' Stipulation, S&Y and the Board Members are DENIED an extension of the page limitations from 15 pages to 20 pages for their Reply Briefs in support of their respective Motions for Summary Judgment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer