Filed: Jun. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Docket Nos. 62, 63, AND 65. RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Preliminary Approval of the Settlement (Docket No. 62), their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Application for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 63), and Declaration of Frank Sommers in Support of Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Dock
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Docket Nos. 62, 63, AND 65. RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Preliminary Approval of the Settlement (Docket No. 62), their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Application for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 63), and Declaration of Frank Sommers in Support of Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docke..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL Docket Nos. 62, 63, AND 65.
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Preliminary Approval of the Settlement (Docket No. 62), their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Application for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 63), and Declaration of Frank Sommers in Support of Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docket No. 65) on May 1, 2014;
WHEREAS, Defendant's Counsel transmitted his letter of May 19, 2014, objecting to statements in these motion papers, contending that they violated the mediation privilege and the Settlement Agreement and unduly disparaged Defendant's Counsel, and requesting the replacement of these papers with statements Defendant's Counsel deemed "offending" to be "removed;"
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Counsel rejects the contentions in Defendant's Counsel's May 19th letter and believes that its initial papers did not violate the Settlement Agreement or the mediation privilege and did not unduly disparage Defendant's Counsel. Plaintiffs' Counsel made changes to many of the sections of the papers that Defendant's Counsel had found "offending" in what it has now served as its Amended Notice of Motion and Motion For Award of Attorneys' Fees and Amended Declaration of Frank F. Sommers, and has agreed to seek an order through an Administrative Motion to Place Docket Nos. 62, 63, and 65 under seal pursuant to Local Rules Section 7-11; and,
WHEREAS, as had been previously agreed between the Court and the parties on the recent hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement, Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Motion and Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs does not identify insurance carriers of the Housing Authority of the County of Marin.
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate to an order of this Court sealing Docket Nos. 62, 63, and 65, in this matter forthwith. The parties therefore request that the Court approve this Stipulation and authorize the sealing of Docket Nos. 62, 63, and 65 herein.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
