CLARK v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., 14-cv-00419 VC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140611873
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Plaintiff Barbara Clark, fka Barbara Hopkins, ("Plaintiff") and Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 10) is extended t
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Plaintiff Barbara Clark, fka Barbara Hopkins, ("Plaintiff") and Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 10) is extended th..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Barbara Clark, fka Barbara Hopkins, ("Plaintiff") and Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 10) is extended through and including June 12, 2014.
Source: Leagle
