Asetek Holdings, Inc. v. Coolit Systems Inc., 3:12-CV-04498-EMC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140617b79
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEF; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARED M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate, with the Court's permission, that Plaintiffs may file their first and only motion for summary judgment not to exceed 30 pages. Defendant previously filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 93), and at the Case Management Conference of
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEF; [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARED M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate, with the Court's permission, that Plaintiffs may file their first and only motion for summary judgment not to exceed 30 pages. Defendant previously filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 93), and at the Case Management Conference of ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEF; [PROPOSED] ORDER
EDWARED M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. ("Defendant") hereby stipulate, with the Court's permission, that Plaintiffs may file their first and only motion for summary judgment not to exceed 30 pages.
Defendant previously filed a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 93), and at the Case Management Conference of April 24, 2014, the Court granted Defendant's request for permission to file a second summary judgment brief without objection by Plaintiffs. Given the complexity of this case (involving three patents in suit), and the above described circumstances, Plaintiffs believe their request is fair and appropriate.
By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the filing of this Stipulation.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
