Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nextdoor.com, Inc. v. Abhyanker, 3:12-cv-05667-EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140618940 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT RAJ ABHYANKER'S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST COUNTERDEFENDANTS NEXTDOOR.COM, INC. AND PRAKASH JANAKIRAMAN EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Nextdoor.com, Inc. ("Nextdoor.com") and Prakash Janakiraman ("Janakiraman") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker ("Abhyanker"), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and request the Court to enter, the f
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT RAJ ABHYANKER'S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST COUNTERDEFENDANTS NEXTDOOR.COM, INC. AND PRAKASH JANAKIRAMAN

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants Nextdoor.com, Inc. ("Nextdoor.com") and Prakash Janakiraman ("Janakiraman") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker ("Abhyanker"), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and request the Court to enter, the following Order resolving Abhyanker's counterclaims in this matter.

1. On December 5, 2013, Abhyanker filed a Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims [Dkt. No. 132] ("SACC"), asserting counterclaims for trade secret misappropriation against Nextdoor.com and Janakiraman, and trademark infringement, infringement of an unregistered mark, and California unfair competition against Nextdoor.com.

2. On May 8, 2014, Nextdoor.com and Abhyanker stipulated to a dismissal of Abhyanker's trademark infringement counterclaim, and to entry of judgment on Nextdoor.com's claim for declaratory judgment that it has established trademark rights, including priority of use, of the NEXTDOOR Mark in the field of online social networking [Dkt. 188].

3. Abhyanker, on behalf of himself and any entities he controls, now or in the future, wishes to dismiss with prejudice and forever release all remaining counterclaims against Nextdoor.com and Janakiraman.

4. Each party preserves the right to move for or oppose an award of attorneys' fees and costs with respect to the matters dismissed and adjudicated by this Order at an appropriate time in this action and to present any and all admissible evidence with respect to such a motion.

5. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed as an admission of liability or wrongdoing of any kind by any of the parties hereto.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories to this filing have provided their consent to this filing.

/s/Bruno W. Tarabichi Bruno W. Tarabichi

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby orders, adjudges and decrees that:

1. Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker's claim of trade secret misappropriation is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker's claims of trademark infringement, to the extent not already dismissed pursuant to the Court's Entry of Partial Dismissal, Dkt. 192, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

3. Counterclaimant Raj Abhyanker's claim of California Unfair Competition is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer