TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORP. v. BLACKMAGIC DESIGN PTY LTD., 4:13-CV-05184 SBA. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140618949
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2014
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER KAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Supplemental [Proposed] Case Management Order to amend certain case deadlines (ECF Nos. 59, 61, and 63 ). The parties have met and conferred regarding the sufficiency of Technology Licensing Corporation's ("TLC") Infringement Contentions, served on March 6, 2014. Without agreeing that its
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER KAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Supplemental [Proposed] Case Management Order to amend certain case deadlines (ECF Nos. 59, 61, and 63 ). The parties have met and conferred regarding the sufficiency of Technology Licensing Corporation's ("TLC") Infringement Contentions, served on March 6, 2014. Without agreeing that its ..
More
SUPPLEMENTAL [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
KAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Supplemental [Proposed] Case Management Order to amend certain case deadlines (ECF Nos. 59, 61, and 63 ). The parties have met and conferred regarding the sufficiency of Technology Licensing Corporation's ("TLC") Infringement Contentions, served on March 6, 2014. Without agreeing that its present contentions are insufficient, and therefore as a compromise, TLC has agreed to amend its contentions, and to serve Amended Infringement Contentions on July 14, 2014. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to amend deadlines triggered by service of infringement contentions per the Patent Local Rules. Additionally, to facilitate constructive mediation, the parties request that the Court extend the ADR deadline to September 1, 2014 so that representatives with settlement authority from each party may attend.
Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Event
None July 14, 2014 Serve Amended "Disclosure of Asserted Claims
and Infringement Contentions." (PLR 3-1).
Produce any additional documents to accompany
contentions. (PLR 3-2).
May 21, 2014 August 4, 2014 Serve "Invalidity Contentions." (PLR 3-3).
Produce documents to accompany "Invalidity
Contentions." (PLR 3-4).
June 9, 2014 August 18, 2014 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction.
(PLR 4-1).
June 30, 2014 September 1, 2014 ADR Deadline
June 30, 2014 September 8, 2014 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Construction and
Extrinsic Evidence. (PLR 4-2).
July 21, 2014 October 3, 2014 File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing
Statement. (PLR 4-3).
August 20, 2014 November 2, 2014 Close of Claim Construction discovery. (PLR-4-4).
September 4, 2014 November 17, 2014 Opening claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5).
September 22, 2014 December 1, 2014 Responsive claim construction brief due.
(PLR 4-5)
October 2, 2014 December 8, 2014 Reply claim construction brief due. (PLR 4-5)
October 17, 2014 December 12, 2014 2 Binders of each side's presentation slides for
Claim construction hearing due.
October 23, 2014 at December 16, 2014 Claim Construction Hearing (PLR 4-6)
10 AM at 10 AM
50 days after the 50 days after the Advice of counsel defense discovery due. (PLR
3-7).
Court's service of Court's service of
the claim the claim
construction ruling
construction ruling
TBD TBD Fact Discovery Cut-off
TBD TBD Designation of Opening Experts with Reports
TBD TBD Designation of Rebuttal Experts with Reports
TBD TBD Expert Discovery Cut-off
TBD TBD Dispositive motions and motions re experts due.
TBD TBD Pretrial Conference
Respectfully submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
