Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. USA Performance Technology, Inc., 3:11-cv-01665-JSW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140624871 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2014
Summary: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Pursuant to the Court's March 25, 2014 Order, Plaintiff E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont") and defendants Walter Liew and USA Performance Technology, Inc. (collectively "USAPT") submit this Joint Status Report. The parties request that the stay in this matter set to expire on June 30, 2014, remain in place for an additional 30 days, through July 30, 2014. On April 6, 201
More

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Court's March 25, 2014 Order, Plaintiff E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont") and defendants Walter Liew and USA Performance Technology, Inc. (collectively "USAPT") submit this Joint Status Report. The parties request that the stay in this matter set to expire on June 30, 2014, remain in place for an additional 30 days, through July 30, 2014.

On April 6, 2011, DuPont filed the instant suit. (Docket # 1.) Defendants filed their Substituted Answer and Counterclaim on July 11, 2011. (Docket # 35.) The action was first stayed July 22, 2011. (Docket # 39.)

On August 23, 2011, the United States filed United States v. Walter Liew and Christina Liew, No. CR-11-0573-RS. On February 7, 2012, the United States filed a superseding indictment in said action. (Id. at Docket # 64.) On March 12, 2013, the United States filed a Second Superseding Indictment. (Id. at Docket # 269.) On or about January 7, 2014, trial began in the criminal action. On March 5, 2014, the jury returned its verdict, finding Mr. Liew and USAPTI guilty of all counts with which they were charged. (Id. at Docket # 804.)

Mr. Liew's sentencing in the criminal case was scheduled initially to take place on June 10, 2014, but was continued to July 10, 2014. (Id. at Docket # 863.) As the Court's disposition of the restitution issue may affect the further course of this case, the parties request that the stay be extended an additional 30 days, to and including July 30, 2014, at which time the parties will report to the Court regarding their proposals for further proceedings.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having read and considered the Joint Status Report,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The parties' request that the stay be extended until July 30, 2014 is hereby GRANTED. Counsel shall submit a joint status report on or before July 23, 2014.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer