Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kyles v. City of Pittsburg, C-13-4695-WHO. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140703b60 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND OTHER APPLICABLE DATES; ORDER WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. TO THE HONORABLE COURT TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: Counsel for Plaintiff was to proceed to trial in the matter Helm v. USA (2:11-cv-01703-MCE-EFB) on December 1, 2014. That trial was to proceed in the Eastern District of California. However, the Court in the Helm matter, Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., continued the trial thereof sua sponte to January 26, 2015, on about
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND OTHER APPLICABLE DATES; ORDER

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Counsel for Plaintiff was to proceed to trial in the matter Helm v. USA (2:11-cv-01703-MCE-EFB) on December 1, 2014. That trial was to proceed in the Eastern District of California. However, the Court in the Helm matter, Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., continued the trial thereof sua sponte to January 26, 2015, on about April 23, 2014 (Order signed April 22, 2014, but filed and served April 23, 2014).

In view of the obvious conflict with the trial date in this case, Plaintiff's counsel conferred with experts and clients in both cases affected by the calendar conflict. He then conferred with counsel in the matter now before this Court. The present schedule in this case is as follows:

Trial: January 26, 2015 8:30 a.m. Deadline to amend/add parties: May 31, 2014 Discovery cutoff: July 31, 2014 Expert disclosure: August 29, 2014 Expert rebuttal: September 12, 2014 Expert discovery cutoff: October 15, 2014 Motions heard by: September 17, 2014

At the request of Plaintiff's counsel, in view of the conflict posed by the change in the earlier filed case before Judge England, with regard to the several trial calendars of all involved attorneys for both Plaintiff and Defendants in this action, the parties hereto, through the undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:

Trial: August 17, 2015 8:30 a.m. Pre-trial Conference: July 6, 2015 2:00 p.m. Deadline to amend/add parties: May 31, 2014 [No change] Discovery cutoff: January 30, 2015 Expert disclosure: February 27, 2015 Expert rebuttal: March 13, 2015 Expert discovery cutoff: April 3, 2015 Motions heard by: April 8, 2015

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES' STIPULATION TO MODIFY

CASE SCHEDULE

I have reviewed the Stipulation and the declaration of counsel. There is no good cause to change any of the dates previously agreed to by the parties and ordered by the Court, particularly since the trial before the Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr., referenced above, is no longer a conflict. I will not change the trial date. However, to assist the parties out of a problem of their own making, I will extend the following events to the new dates listed below:

Discovery cutoff: September 15, 2014 Expert disclosure: September 15, 2014 Expert rebuttal: October 3, 2014 Expert discovery cutoff: October 17, 2014 Motions heard by: October 22, 2014

Trial remains set for January 26, 2015. The pretrial conference is set for December 15, 2014. A further Case Management Conference is set for September 23, 2014 at 2 p.m. A further Joint Case Management Statement is due on September 16, 2014. The parties shall mediate this matter by October 21, 2014; in the event the parties wish to utilize the Court's ADR Unit for that purpose, within seven days they shall set up an appointment to schedule the mediation.

In light of this Order, there is no need for counsel to appear at the Case Management Conference scheduled for July 8, 2014 unless there is an issue concerning any of the dates listed above.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer