NXP B.V. v. Broadcom Corporation, 5:14-cv-00826-EJD. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140718812
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff NXP B.V. ("NXP") and Defendant Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, and stipulate as follows: 1. NXP hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims asserted by NXP in this action. 2. Broadcom hereby dismisses without prejudice all counterclaims asserted by Broadcom in this
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff NXP B.V. ("NXP") and Defendant Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, and stipulate as follows: 1. NXP hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims asserted by NXP in this action. 2. Broadcom hereby dismisses without prejudice all counterclaims asserted by Broadcom in this a..
More
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff NXP B.V. ("NXP") and Defendant Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") file this Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, and stipulate as follows:
1. NXP hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims asserted by NXP in this action.
2. Broadcom hereby dismisses without prejudice all counterclaims asserted by Broadcom in this action.
3. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
