Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CLARK v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., 14-cv-00419 VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140721700 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2014
Summary: JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE (1) HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, (2) RELATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND (3) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Plaintiff Barbara Clark, fka Barbara Hopkins, ("Plaintiff') and Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (collectively "Defendants", and together with Plaintiff the "Parties"), by and through their attorne
More

JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE (1) HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, (2) RELATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND (3) CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

Plaintiff Barbara Clark, fka Barbara Hopkins, ("Plaintiff') and Defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Chase Home Finance, LLC, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (collectively "Defendants", and together with Plaintiff the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby jointly request that the Court continue the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 21) and the Case Management Conference both currently set on this Court's calendar for hearing on July 31, 2014 to August 28, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. The Parties will file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before August 21, 2014. The Parties additionally request that the Court approve the following briefing schedule for the remaining briefing related to that Motion:

• Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be due on or before August 7, 2014;

• Defendants' reply to the Motion to Dismiss shall be due on or before August 21, 2014.

The Parties request a continuance of the hearing, Motion to Dismiss briefing schedule, and the Case Management Conference to allow them an opportunity to explore settlement possibilities.

This is the Parties' second request to continue the motion to dismiss hearing and related briefing schedule and the first request to continue the Case Management Conference. The Parties previously stipulated to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by thirty days.

This request will impact the Case Management Conference, which the Court set to coincide with the Motion to Dismiss hearing. It will not impact any other deadlines set in the case.

[PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED

The Court does not contemplate granting any further requests for a continuance.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer