Filed: Jul. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2014
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiff Timothy Ray Richardson and defendants Fluor Corporation ("Fluor") and Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc. ("FMS"), through their respective counsel, respectfully request the Court modify its pretrial scheduling order (Dkt. No. 38) to extend the deadline to complete expert discovery. 1. The Parties request the Court extend the deadline for expert discover
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Plaintiff Timothy Ray Richardson and defendants Fluor Corporation ("Fluor") and Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc. ("FMS"), through their respective counsel, respectfully request the Court modify its pretrial scheduling order (Dkt. No. 38) to extend the deadline to complete expert discovery. 1. The Parties request the Court extend the deadline for expert discovery..
More
SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Timothy Ray Richardson and defendants Fluor Corporation ("Fluor") and Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc. ("FMS"), through their respective counsel, respectfully request the Court modify its pretrial scheduling order (Dkt. No. 38) to extend the deadline to complete expert discovery.
1. The Parties request the Court extend the deadline for expert discovery to August 31, 2014. The current deadline to complete expert discovery is July 18, 2014. (Dkt. No. 66.)
2. This extension is necessary to permit the deposition of plaintiff's retained expert, Beth De Lima (set for August 13, 2014), and defendants' retained expert, Ronald Roberts, whose deposition has yet to be set. The parties are meeting and conferring regarding finalizing a date for Dr. Roberts' deposition.
3. The requested extension will not conflict with any other pretrial scheduling deadlines.
4. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 16-2(d)-(e) and Local Rule 7, the Parties hereby submit this stipulation for modification of the pretrial scheduling order (Dkt. No. 38).
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
