Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140723974 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiff HP and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter the following order setting a briefing schedule for anticipated motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, the Court signed a Stipulation and Order permitting HP to file a Second Amended Complaint and granting Defend
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS HP'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Plaintiff HP and Defendants, through the undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter the following order setting a briefing schedule for anticipated motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, the Court signed a Stipulation and Order permitting HP to file a Second Amended Complaint and granting Defendants 45 days to respond to that complaint (Dkt. 33);

WHEREAS, HP filed its Second Amended Complaint on June 23, 2014 (Dkt. 36);

WHEREAS, Defendants' responses to the Second Amended Complaint are due on August 7, 2014;

WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that there will be at least one motion to dismiss filed and have conferred and reached agreement on a briefing schedule for any such motion;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed on a briefing schedule that places these motions on the same calendar as the motion to dismiss in the companion HP case in this MDL;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, subject to Court approval, that the following briefing schedule shall apply to any motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint: any motion to dismiss shall be due no later than August 7, 2014; any opposition shall be due no later than September 11, 2014; and any reply shall be due no later than October 2, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer