Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT v. CRANE, 5:13-cv-00945-VC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140729887 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and Your Honor's Standing Order for Civil Cases, this Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiff Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit ("Lead Plaintiff") and Defendants Epocrates, Inc., Rosemary A. Crane, and Patrick D. Spangler ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorney
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and Your Honor's Standing Order for Civil Cases, this Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiff Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit ("Lead Plaintiff") and Defendants Epocrates, Inc., Rosemary A. Crane, and Patrick D. Spangler ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record.

WHEREAS, on June 25, 2014, Lead Plaintiff filed the Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (ECF No. 66);

WHEREAS, on July 14, 2014, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (ECF No. 67) (the "Motion"), with a noticed hearing date of September 18, 2014;

WHEREAS, currently Lead Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion is due on July 28, 2014, and Defendants' reply is due on August 4, 2014;

WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts for Lead Plaintiff's Counsel, the parties agreed to modify the briefing schedule for the Motion and move the hearing date;

WHEREAS, a new hearing date of October 2, 2014 has been reserved with the Court; and

WHEREAS, this is the first request for a modification of the schedule for this Motion;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that:

1. Plaintiffs' opposition is due on August 11, 2014; 2. Defendants' reply is due on August 25, 2014; and 3. The hearing on the Motion is scheduled for October 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer